CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EVERS, W.
Right arrow Articles by DOBKIN, A. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by EVERS, W.
Right arrow Articles by DOBKIN, A. B

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 12, 281-287, Copyright © 1965 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Influence of Doxapram Hydrochloride on Recovery from Thiopental Anaesthesia

WILLIAM EVERS MD1, KRISHAN MALIK MD1, and ALLEN B DOBKIN MD1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY 13210

Cross-over experiments performed in dogs showed that Doxapram hydrochloride in a single-dose injection was as effective as d-amphetamme in shortening the recovery time from a standardized dose of thiopental anaesthesia and was more effective than methylphenidate in the dosages that were compared. No untoward effects were observed in any of these experiments.

When Doxapram hydrochloride was used in an intravenous infusion method for 50 healthy female patients following an elective dilation and curettage of the uterus, the drug was effective for stimulationg respirations (both tidal volume and respiration rate) without producing any appreciable circulatory changes. In four instances, there were signs of central nervous system irritation which subsided prompltly upon discontinuation of the Doxapram infusion.

An appreciable difference in the time for full recovery to occur was found between patients receving the analeptic and others who did not Direct clinical observation leaves no doubt that an arousal effect is produced which persists along with the augmneted breathing response. However, an accelerated recovery from thiopental anaesthesia is not a prominent effect with respect to the expected recovery time because it did not appreciably reduce the total "sleeping time" following a double "sleep dose" of thiopental in humans.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.