CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BROMAGE, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BROMAGE, P. R.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 16, 37-45, Copyright © 1969 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

A Comparison of Bupivacaine and Tetracaine in Epidural Analgesia for Surgery

PHILIP R. BROMAGE M.B., B.S., F.F.A.R.C.S.1

1 Department of Anaesthesia, McGill University, and Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal

The new long-acting local anaesthetic, bupivacaine, has been compared with tetracaine using a 0.5 per cent solution for epidural analgesia in 103 surgical patients.

Both agents had almost identical latency of action and dose requirements. Analgesia commenced in 5.8-6.6 minutes and took about 18 minutes to spread to the first sacral segment. Dose requirements in milligrams per spinal segment at twenty years of age were the same for both agents and about one-fifth the amount needed for lignocaine or mepivacaine. The two agents differed appreciably in the qualities of their sensory and motor blockade. Tetracaine caused 66 per cent more motor paralysis of the legs than bupivacaine, whereas the duration of action of bupivacaine (196 minutes) was 20 per cent longer than that of tetracaine. There was suggestive but inconclusive evidence that the intensity of sensory blockade from bupivacaine may be superior to that of tetracaine.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.