CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MELGRAVE, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MELGRAVE, A. P.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 17, 256-260, Copyright © 1970 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

The Use of Epinephrine in the Presence of Halothane in Children

ANTHONY P. MELGRAVE M.B., B.S.

A series of 230 cases of children who received epinephrine by subcutaneous injection during halothane anaesthesia is presented. Almost half of these cases were bilateral otoplasties. Plastic surgery procedures constituted three quarters of all cases. Epinephrine in local anaesthetic solution was in a concentration of either 1:100, 000 (10 /µg/ml) or 1:200, 000 (5 µg/ml). Doses prorated from the allowable dose based on adult studies (100 µ/150 pounds body weight) were likely to be exceeded in pharyngoplasties, cleft palates, and mastoidectomies. The anaesthesia maintenance technique most commonly used was Ayre's T-piece with a flow of 5 L of nitrous oxide to 3 L of oxygen and 0.5 per cent halothane, in an attempt to avoid hypercapnia during spontaneous ventilation. The technique of marking and tattooing by the surgeon, in otoplasties, not uncommonly resulted in either mild tachycardia or hypertension, or both. These appeared to subside during the injection of the epinephrine which followed. It is suggested that perhaps children may be more tolerant of exogenous epinephrine injected subcutaneously than are adults.

However, the explanation might be quite simple. As an example, the latest study of Walts and Dillon6 suggests that if dose per unit body weight, rather than the newer concept of dose per unit body area, is used in translating adult doses down to children, then the children will receive less of the drug than they actually require or can tolerate. This present study was based on dose for weight.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.