CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOUZADA, N. L.
Right arrow Articles by TROP, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LOUZADA, N. L.
Right arrow Articles by TROP, D.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 17, 370-377, Copyright © 1970 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Lung Mechanics and Blood Gases During Anaesthesia with Spontaneous Respiration

NEY L. LOUZADA M.D., M.SC1 and DAVY TROP M.D., M.SC.1

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal Neurological Hospital and Institute, McGill University, Montreal

Lung mechanics and blood gases were studied throughout the course of anaesthesia in 20 patients undergoing cerebral angiographic procedures. Measurements started before premedication and continued into the recovery period, each subject acting as his own control.

Premedication (0.015 mg/kg atropine) did not affect Cdyn, Q·s/Q·t, and AaDo2. Induction of anaesthesia resulted in a significant fall in Cdyn, but no alteration in Q·s/Q·t. There were no changes in Cdyn, Q·s/Q·t, and AaDo2 up to 96 minutes after induction. Cdyn returned to preoperative values during the recovery period, and Q·s/Q·t and AaDo2 remained unaffected.

The fall in Cdyn was probably due to a change in the time constants of the different parts of the lungs. The concomitant and probably proportional decrease in Q·t and V·o2 seems a valid explanation for the lack of changes in Q·s/Q·t. Thirteen out of sixteen patients, however, showed an increased Q·s/Q·t late after induction, when values were compared with the preinduction ones. A closure of some units is thus suggested.

Note:

Presented at the 1969 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Anaesthetists' Society. This study was supported in part by research grant 690044 from the Conseil de la Recherche Médicale du Quebec, and grant 68/274-69/446 from FAPESP-SSO Paulo. This paper forms part of Dr. Louzada's M.SC. thesis for the Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.