CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORISOT, P.
Right arrow Articles by GUILMET, CL.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MORISOT, P.
Right arrow Articles by GUILMET, CL.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 22, 144-148, Copyright © 1975 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Effets de la Décurarisation Post-Opératoire par la Néostigmine Sur Les Anastomoses Digestives

P. MORISOT 1, J. LOYGUE 2, and CL. GUILMET 3

1 Département d'Anesthésiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris. L'adresses actuelle du Docteur Morisot est au Département D'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Intercommunal, 91160 Longjumeau
2 Département de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris
3 Agrégé, Département d'Anesthésiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 184 rue du Faubourg St Antoine, 75571 Paris 12

A prospective study was undertaken to assess the influence of neostigmine, a reversal agent for curarimimetic myorelaxants, on the incidence of postoperative disruption of anastomotic sites. Over a period of one year, 400 patients had surgery, including anastomosis, on the digestive tract for a variety of surgical conditions (Table II). At the end of anaesthesia, 200 patients received doses of atropine and neostigmine, usually 1 mg and 2.5 mg of each, as indicated on clinical basis and neuromuscular stimulation. The other patients did not receive these drugs and were ventilated till the myorelaxation vanished spontaneously.

During the postoperative period the incidence of anastomotic breakdown was assessed by the surgeon, unaware of the use or the omission of neostigmine in his patients. Anastomotic leakage was classified in four groups, namely: proved, absent, likely and unlikely.

In this series and according to these clinical criteria, both groups had an incidence of anastomotic breakdown which was not significantly different (Table III). Neostigmine as used in this work does not seem to compromise the normal healing of anastomotic sites on the digestive tract.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.