CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DOBKIN, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by SIMONDS, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DOBKIN, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by SIMONDS, J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 23, 596-600, Copyright © 1976 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Butorphanol Tartrate: 1. Safety and Efficacy in Multidose Control of Postoperative Pain

ALLEN B. DOBKIN 1, BENJAMIN F. AFRICA 1, ROBERT J. NOVECK 1, FRANK S. CARUSO 1, BARBARA ESPOSITO 1, and JUDITH SIMONDS 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, State University Hospital, Syracuse, New York, 13210, U.S.A.

Butorphanol tartrate is a potent synthetic analgesic. It was administered to 150 consenting patients with severe pain after recovery from anaesthesia. Three dose levels were used and the initial dose was based on the size and physical condition of the patient. The drug was subsequently repeated, as requested by the patients, for 12 to 18 hours following major surgery. Each patient was kept under direct surveillance by trained observers during the course of this study and the pain relief medication was evaluated for efficacy and safety. Ten patients requested a change of medication after their initial treatment, usually because pain relief was said to be inadequate, and two subjects may have developed behavioural disturbances that we related to multiple doses of butorphanol tartrate, but which could have been due to the fear of a lethal lesion. None of the patients developed appreciable changes in vital signs due to the analgesic.

We have concluded that this analgesic is safe and that it is as efficacious as equipotent doses of morphine and pentazocine, with a similar duration of action. It is therefore worthy of further evaluation since its propensity to causing addiction and respiratory depression is low.

Note:

From the Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, State University Hospital, Syracuse, New York, 13210, U.S.A.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.