CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McINTYRE, J.W. R.
Right arrow Articles by HOSEIN, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McINTYRE, J.W. R.
Right arrow Articles by HOSEIN, H. R.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 25, 499-505, Copyright © 1978 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

An Assessment of Operating Room Environment Air Contamination with Nitrous Oxide and Halothane and some Scavenging Methods

J.W. R. McINTYRE F.R.C.P.(C)1, J. T. PURDHAM Ph.D., M.C.I.C.2, and H. R. HOSEIN M.Sc., C.I.H.2

1 Dept. of Anaesthesia, University of Alberta
2 Occupational Hygiene Branch, Occupational Health and Safety Division, Alberta Labour

This study was designed to assess operating room contamination with nitrous oxide and halothane when nitrous oxide 3 l/min and oxygen 2 l/min containing halothane one per cent were passed into a semiclosed circle absorber system from which the patients' lungs were ventilated with an Ohio ventimeter through a cuffed tracheal tube, with the exhaled gas vented to the floor. The normal room ventilation did not consistently maintain levels below the suggested amounts, which are nitrous oxide 25 ppm and halothane 2 ppm. Careful daily check for and correction of high and low pressure leaks combined with the use of a Foregger scavenging device (7-351-005) and continuous wall vacuum accepting approximately 22 l/min enabled geometric mean values below the suggested levels to be achieved. The Protection Filter Foregger 7-365-001 was only effective in removing halothane and only if the plastic holder provided was radically modified. Attention is drawn to the numerous factors influencing the magnitude of contamination, aspects of controlling it, and the necessity to cope with the problem of dealing with scavenged gases and vapours.

Note:

Financially Supported by the Dept. of National Health and Welfare Grant No. 609-1047-40 and performed in collaboration with the Occupational Health and Safety Division Government of Alberta.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.