CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by UTTING, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by SHELLEY, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by UTTING, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by SHELLEY, F. C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 26, 472-478, Copyright © 1979 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Human Misadventure in Anaesthesia

J. E. UTTING 1, T. C. GRAY 2, and F. C. SHELLEY 3

1 University of Liverpool, Royal Liverpool Hospital, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX, England
2 Medical Defence Union
3 Under-secretary, Medical Defence Union

An account is given of the 602 anaesthetic accidents reported to the Medical Defence Union of the United Kingdom over the eight-year period 1970-1977: these were reported from a total membership of 2,000 anaesthetists. It is known that reporting of minor accidents, for example damage to teeth, is very imcomplete, and that many deaths associated with surgery but due to disease processes rather than anaesthesia would not be reported either. It is thought, however, that the reporting by members of other accidents involving death and cerebral damage is likely to be complete, or nearly so.

Cases of death and cerebral damage reported numbered 348 (60 per cent of the total) and the causes of these two major accidents were so closely similar that it was possible to deal with them together. This appears to be a suitable approach since cerebral damage can be as great, or greater, a catastrophe than death. In nearly half of this group of accidents there was discernibly faulty technique. Failure of postoperative care (10 per cent of the 348 cases) was another prominent and avoidable cause.

Analysis of the faulty anaesthetic techniques which led to these major accidents showed that factors involved in tracheal intubation were preeminent, and that misuse of apparatus was also conspicuous. Over all error was deemed to be twice as common a cause of death and cerebral damage as was misadventure.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.