CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MALTBY, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by PHILLIPS, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MALTBY, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by PHILLIPS, R.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 27, 331-337, Copyright © 1980 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Comparison of Flunitrazepam and Thiopentone for Induction of General Anaesthesia

J. R. MALTBY 1, R. C. HAMILTON 1, and R. PHILLIPS 2

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Foothills Hospital, Calgary
2 Medical Department, Hoffmann-La Roche, Vaudreuil, Quebec

Forty female out-patients undergoing therapeutic abortion participated in a double-blind study comparing flunitrazepam 0.05 mg·kg-1 with thiopentone 6.0 mg·kg-1 as induction agents for general anaesthesia. Induction time, as measured by the time to loss of lid reflex and voluntary speech, was not only significantly longer in patients receiving flunitrazepam, but also much more variable and imprecise than with thiopentone.

The Steward recovery room scores and psychomotor drawing test results revealed that recovery was significantly slower in the flunitrazepam group. Anterograde amnesia was observed in all patients who had received flunitrazepam and in one patient who had received thiopentone. No retrograde amnesia was found in either group. Flunitrazepam produced postoperative drowsiness, sedation, ataxia and nausea while with thiopentone discomfort from surgery and discomfort at the intravenous injection site were the main complaints.

Because of the slowness of induction with flunitrazepam and marked individual variation, we do not feel that this drug can be considered a suitable agent for routine induction of general anaesthesia.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.