CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARTIN, R.
Right arrow Articles by TÉTREAULT, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MARTIN, R.
Right arrow Articles by TÉTREAULT, L.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 28, 217-223, Copyright © 1981 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Lidocaine Hydrocarbonate and Lidocaine Hydrochloride with and without Epinephrine in Epidural Anaesthesia

R. MARTIN M.D., F.R.C.P.(C)1, Y. LAMARCHE M.D., F.R.C.P.(C)1, and L. TÉTREAULT M.D., M.Sc., F.C.C.P.2

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4
2 Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4

Epidural analgesia was administered to one hundred patients undergoing various types of surgical procedures. They were divided at random into four equal groups who received lidocaine hydrocarbonate or lidocaine hydrochloride, both with or without epinephrine. A double blind method was used. The study was designed first to test the validity of claims that lidocaine hydrocarbonate produces a shorter period of onset for effective analgesia, a more profound sensory and motor block, and a higher spread of analgesia than the hydrochloride salt and secondly, to identify the respective roles of carbon dioxide and epinephrine in obtaining this alleged superior effectiveness.

The results of the study showed that carbon dioxide improved the quality of sensory block, but we could not find any significant difference between lidocaine hydrocarbonate and lidocaine hydrochloride salt, with and without epinephrine, with regard to rapidity of onset, upward spread of analgesia and quality of motor block. As was already known, duration of analgesia was prolonged by the addition of epinephrine but not by the addition of carbon dioxide.

The study also showed that the compliance of the epidural space was decreased in the lidocaine hydrocarbonate groups compared to those with lidocaine hydrochloride. There is a positive correlation between the duration of sensory block or the upper level of analgesia and compliance in the hundred patients studied.

It is concluded that the hydrocarbonate base, because of its more profound sensory block in the L5-S1 segment, can be useful for operations on the lower extremities, especially in the L5-S1, segmental distribution. However, knowing that the hydrocarbonate base is more expensive, one must use his own judgment in appraising the cost-benefit of its use.

Key Words: ANAESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, Epidural • ANAESTHETICS, LOCAL, lidocaine hydrocarbonate, lidocaine hydrochloride






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.