CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRANT, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by JENKINS, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GRANT, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by JENKINS, L. C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 29, 112-116, Copyright © 1982 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Prediction of the Need for Postoperative Mechanical Ventilation in Myasthenia Gravis: Thymectomy Compared to Other Surgical Procedures

RAYMER P. GRANT 1 and LEONARD C. JENKINS 1

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V5Z 1M7

In a recent report Leventhal, Orkin, and Hirsh11 described a scoring system felt to be of value in predicting the need for postoperative mechanical ventilation in patients with myasthenia gravis undergoing thymectomy. Leventhal, et al. identified four risk factors felt to have predictive value, namely: (1) duration of myasthenia gravis ≥6 years, (2) chronic respiratory disease, (3) dose of pyridostigmine ≥750 mg per day, and (4) vital capacity ≤ 2.9 litres.

Forty-six patients with myasthenia gravis who received 68 general anaesthetics were studied retrospectively. They represented the past 10 years' anaesthetic experience with myasthenia gravis at the Vancouver General Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) those who underwent thymectomy, and (2) those who underwent procedures other than thymectomy. Using the risk factors of Leventhal, et al., a predictive score was assessed for each patient; the time to postoperative tracheal extubation was also noted for each patient.

From this study it was concluded that the scoring system proposed by Leventhal, et al. may have been of some value in predicting whether or not a particular patient undergoing thymectomy was likely to need ventilation postoperatively. In 41 myasthenics who had procedures other than thymectomy, however, this scoring system was found to be of no value.

Key Words: COMPLICATIONS, myasthenia gravis • VENTILATION, postoperative







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.