CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAVIES, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by CRAIG, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DAVIES, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by CRAIG, D. B.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 29, 473-476, Copyright © 1982 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Leakage of Volatile Anaesthetics from Agent-Specific Keyed Vapourizer Filling Devices

J. M. DAVIES M.D., F.R.C.P.(C)1, L. STRUNIN M.D., F.F.A.R.C.S., F.R.C.P.(C)1, and D. B. CRAIG M.D., F.R.C.P.(C)2

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Foothills Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
2 Department of Anesthesia, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0Z3

Agent-specific keyed vapourizer filling devices were designed to ensure that an anaesthetic vapourizer is filled with the correct agent. Since there appear to be no reports of possible loss of volatile agent or operating room pollution resulting from either the design or patterns of use of these devices, measurements were made with three anaesthetic agents and two methods of use. First, two bottles each of methoxyflurane, enflurane and halothane were fitted with a suitable filling device and the weight of agent lost from each bottle over six weeks was measured. Bottle # 1 of each agent remained without agitation between weighings; bottle # 2 was tipped to mimic filling of a vapourizer. Weight loss over the six week period was 2.76 and 3.15 per cent of the halothane, 2.22 and 2.43 per cent of the enflurane, and 0.58 and 0.96 per cent of the methoxyflurane, for bottles # 1 and # 2, respectively. Second, pollution was measured with an infra-red analyser for halothane, using bottles # 1 and # 2, as described above, and a third bottle on which the filling device was replaced by the screw-on cap after each filling of the vapourizer. Vapour loss was undetectable for bottle # 1, between 25 and 30ppm for bottle # 2, and between 350 and 400 ppm for bottle # 3. Thus, although the design of the filling devices results in loss of the anaesthetic agent, this loss represents potential pollution only when the device is replaced by the screw-on cap between use. Therefore, when using filling devices, these should be left on the bottle of volatile agent between fillings to decrease operating room pollution.

Key Words: EQUIPMENT, vapourizer filling devices • OPERATING ROOMS, air pollution






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.