CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FORREST, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FORREST, J. B.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 29, S7-S10, Copyright © 1982 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Clinical Evaluation of Isoflurane: Regional Geographic Demography

JAMES B. FORREST

The most significant geographic differences relate to the incidence of the drugs as premedication and for induction of anaesthesia and the concentration of isoflurane used. Thus narcotic use in premedication was much more common in institutions in the NE and NC regions, whereas narcotic use at induction was more common in the South and in Canada. The effect of these different patterns of prescribing of narcotics had the effect of influencing the isoflurane concentration used. The use of anticholinergics showed a three-fold difference between the NC region and Canada, undoubtedly reflecting different approaches to the need for vagolytic action.

The prevalence of disease and coexisting cardiorespiratory drug therapy was higher in the South and NE in most instances. It is likely that this reflects the older mean age of patients in these regions. However, the proportion of patients over 80 years of age was highest in Canada and least in the Western region where respiratory, circulatory, and CNS disease were rather more frequent. The significant differences for some procedures, for example EENT and intraabdominal, could not be explained on the basis of age differences alone.

Apart from different rates of disease and the influence that has on rates for the various procedures, it seems likely that an important determinant of the latter as well as of the anaesthetic drugs used before, during, and after operation relates to what might be described as "usual practice". The outcome of such differences in terms of morbidity and complications requires detailed and careful analysis which must take account of the many patient factors as well. Although there were differences for reflex activity and complications between regions, these were such that no clear explanation of their occurrence could be made on the basis of regional factors. The later sections on reflex activity by Dr. C. Buffington and complications by Dr. K. Rehder describe, in detail, the results of the analysis of patient and demographic factors related to these outcomes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.