CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DONEN, N.
Right arrow Articles by GUTTORMSON, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DONEN, N.
Right arrow Articles by GUTTORMSON, B.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 30, 194-200, Copyright © 1983 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

The esophageal obturator airway: AN APPRAISAL

NEIL DONEN MD1, W. ARNOLD TWEED MD1, SIDNEY DASHFSKY 1, and BARRY GUTTORMSON EMT1

1 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Manitoba and the Winnipeg Ambulance Service, Winnipeg, Manitoba

Address Correspondence to: Neil Donen, MD, Critical Care Services, St. Boniface General Hospital, 409 Taché Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6.

The use of the Esophageal Obturator Airway (EOA) was prospectively studied in 300 cases of prehospital cardiac arrests. Seventy-seven complications were documented in 72 patients. Inadvertent tracheal intubation occurred in 13 patients, five unrecognized. No differences were found when initial emergency room rhythm and resuscitation outcome were compared to a previous study sing the oral airway (OA). A subgroup of 124 EOA and 55 OA patients were compared. The EOA was effective in reducing the frequency of aspiration (17 vs 34 per cent). Arterial oxygenation was similar, and rose in both groups following tracheal intubation. Esophageal trauma was found in 10 per cent of the EOA patients who underwent autopsy. Although the EOA is useful in prehospital emergency care, the only advantage for this technique in comparison to the OA is the prevention of aspiration of gastric contents. It also appears that other techniques of advanced cardiac life support, i.e. defibrillation, drug therapy, etc. are necessary to improve survival statistics.

Key Words: EQUIPMENT, AIRWAY: esophageal obturator, oral • VENTILATION: artificial







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.