| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 31, 359-363, Copyright © 1984 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
1 Departments of Anaesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
2 The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
3 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
Address correspondence to: Dr. A.A. Artru, Department of Anesthesiology, RN-10, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, WA 98195.
Our study sought to determine whether premedication with intramuscular midazolam would decrease the time to induction of anaesthesia with intravenous midazolam, and if so whether induction of anaesthesia would be as rapid as with thiopentone or ketamine, intravenously. Eighty-nine patients, ASA physical status I or II, received midazolam 0.2 mg·kg-1, thiopentone 3.0 mg·kg-1, or ketamine 2.0 mg·kg-1 intravenously 60-90 min after intramuscular injection of either midazolam 0.07 mg·kg-1 or matching placebo. Time to induction of anaesthesia or the dose required to induce anaesthesia with intravenous midazolam was not decreased by midazolam premedication. Both with or without premedication.
Key Words: ANAESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS ketamine, thiopentone HYPNOTICS: benzodiazepines, midazolam INDUCTION: anaesthesia PREMEDICATION: midazolam
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |