CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NADEAU, S.
Right arrow Articles by TOUSIGNANT, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by NADEAU, S.
Right arrow Articles by TOUSIGNANT, M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 32, 283-286, Copyright © 1985 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Technical Report: Use of a Urologic Set for Improved Fluid Administration Rates

SERGE NADEAU MD1 and MICHEL TOUSIGNANT MD FRCP(C)1

1 Department of Anaesthesia, The University of Ottawa and The Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario

Address correspondence to: Dr. Serge Nadeau, Department of Anaesthesia, The Ottawa General Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6.

This study was designed to compare flow rates of three sets of tubings: a large bore (8 mm) Y-urologic set (Y-URO); a Y-URO with an added in-line blood filter (Y-URO + BF); and a currently used (3.5 mm diameter) blood transfusion set (Y-TRANSFUSION). The time required to empty a one litre bag of Ringer's Lactate from a 1.0 meter vertical drop was measured while using four different IV catheters (9.5, 10, 14 and 16 gauge), and the flow rates calculated.

When a 9.5-gauge catheter was used, the flow rates obtained by the Y-URO and the Y-URO + BF were respectively 269 and 162 per cent higher than those achieved by the Y-TRANSFUSION. This wide margin was decreased to 41 and 39 per cent with a 16-gauge catheter. A 9.5-gauge catheter, when compared to a 16-gauge, allowed a 346 per cent improvement in flow rates with the Y-URO, a 225 per cent with the Y-URO + BF and only a 71 per cent increase with the Y-TRANSFUSION. The urologic set allows better fluid flow because of the larger diameter of its tubing. This adaptation of a large bore urologic irrigation set can be very useful when rapid fluid administration is imperative.

Key Words: EQUIPMENT: fluid infusion sets, blood infusion sets







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.