CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JANSON, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by POULTON, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by JANSON, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by POULTON, T. J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 33, 157-161, Copyright © 1986 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Does Peep Reduce the Incidence of Aspiration Around Endotracheal Tubes?

BRAD A. JANSON BS1 and THOMAS J. POULTON MD1

1 Departments of Anesthesiology, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska

Address correspondence to: Dr. Thomas J. Poulton, Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, 601 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131.

Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cm H2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.

Key Words: EQUIPMENT, TUBES: endotracheal • COMPLICATIONS: aspiration • VENTILATION: PEEP, mechanical, spontaneous







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.