CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMORLAND, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by DOUGLAS, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McMORLAND, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by DOUGLAS, M. J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 33, 185-194, Copyright © 1986 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

A Survey of Obstetric Anaesthesia Practice in British Columbia

GRAHAM H. McMORLAND MB CHB FRCPC1, LEONARD C. JENKINS MD CM FRCPC1, and M. JOANNE DOUGLAS MD FRCPC1

1 Department of Anaesthesia, University of British Columbia and Grace Hospital, Vancouver, B.C.

Address correspondence to: Dr. G.H. McMorland, Department of Anaesthesia, Grace Hospital, 4490 Oak Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6H 3V5.

Hospitals and anaesthetists in British Columbia were surveyed by means of questionnaires to assess patterns of obstetric anaesthesia practice, qualifications and numbers of obstetric anaesthesia personnel, hospital obstetric facilities and facilities and protocols for neonatal resuscitation.

It was apparent that a large proportion of the obstetric anaesthesia service in this province was being provided by physicians who were not trained, nor certified, as anaesthesia specialists.

Preanaesthetic assessment in the obstetric units differed in attitude and practice from the standards expected in the general operating rooms. There was also in community hospitals a significant incidence of failure to follow certain accepted safe practices (in obstetric patients), such as preinduction hydration and oxygenation, cricoid pressure during intubation and prevention of aortocaval compression. However, administration of general anaesthesia without endotracheal intubation, was rare in this survey.

Post-anaesthetic recovery facilities in obstetric units were conspicuously deficient, even in the larger hospitals.

The majority of community hospitals lacked written protocols for neonatal resuscitation; and the number of institutions reporting that the neonatal heart rates and temperatures were not routinely monitored is of concern.

It is recommended that minimum standards for training in obstetric anaesthesia should be clearly defined; and provision should be made for revision and upgrading of knowledge and skills for physicians practicing anaesthesia in smaller community hospitals.

Key Words: ANAESTHESIA, obstetric







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.