CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PORTER, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDBERG, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PORTER, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDBERG, R. J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 33, 394-398, Copyright © 1986 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Intraoperative Allergic Reactions to Hydroxyethyl Starch: A Report of two Cases

SUSAN S. PORTER MD1 and ROBERT J. GOLDBERG MD1

1 University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Anaesthesiology

Address correspondence to: Dr. Susan S. Porter, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 39th and Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, Kansas 66103.

The presentation, evolution, and treatment of two cases of intraoperative allergic reactions are described. In each case, the offending agent was felt to be hydroxyethyl starch (HES), a synthetic polymer colloid solution used for intravascular volume expansion. Symptoms included urticaria, angioedema, and hypotension in the first patient, and urticaria, hypoxia, and haemoconcentration in the second patient. Both patients had earlier received multiple drugs and/or blood products. However, HES administration in both patients immediately produced allergic symptomatology. The first patient had con-current depression of serum total complement levels (CH50) and no elevation of plasma histamine levels, which suggested a complement-mediated reaction to HES. Levels of CH50 and histamine were not obtained from the second patient. Direct stimulation of mast cell degranulation by the offending agent, complement activation, or conventional antigen-antibody interaction in a previously exposed patient may initiate intraoperative allergic reactions. Anaesthesia personnel should be aware of the risk of intraoperative allergic reactions to HES and be prepared to treat them rapidly and effectively.

Key Words: COMPLICATIONS: allergic reaction • FLUID BALANCE: hydroxyethyl starch







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.