CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 34, 2-8, Copyright © 1987 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Postoperative complications: factors of significance to anaesthetic practice

PG Duncan and MM Cohen

In an attempt to define what factors are important to the development of postanaesthetic complications, the data from a nine-year prospective study of anaesthetic practice in a large tertiary care institution were evaluated. A model of anaesthetic morbidity dependent upon factors of patient illness, surgical practice, anaesthetic technique and physician experience, and duration of anaesthesia was developed. Postoperative anaesthetic morbidity was defined as any anaesthetic-related complication which, in the opinion of the follow-up nurse, was associated with prolonged hospitalization or documented compromise of the patient. Using a multiple logistic regression, ASA physical status was a risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio = 1.95) but the number of preoperative conditions and age were not. The type of surgical procedure, classified by site or by degree of trauma, did not influence postanaesthetic complication rates. The duration of anaesthetic exposure was an important determinant of risk (odds ratio = 2.53), with complications increasing with the length of anaesthetic time. As to factors under control of the anaesthetist those patients experiencing operating room complications (odds ratio = 3.36) or those receiving pure spinal (odds ratio = 5.53) or narcotic techniques (odds ratio = 2.14) had higher risks of postoperative complications. Finally, it would appear that the greater the experience of the anaesthetist the less the risk of postoperative problems (odds ratio = 0.52).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Heidegger, Y. Husemann, M. Nuebling, D. Morf, T. Sieber, A. Huth, R. Germann, P. Innerhofer, A. Faserl, C. Schubert, et al.
Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care: development of a psychometric questionnaire and benchmarking among six hospitals in Switzerland and Austria{dagger}{ddagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2002; 89(6): 863 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.