CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tolpin, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Michaux, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tolpin, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Michaux, K.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 34, 366-372, Copyright © 1987 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Effects of anaesthetic agents on erythrocyte fragility: comparison of normal and malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients

EI Tolpin, JE Fletcher, H Rosenberg and K Michaux

The effects on erythrocyte fragility of two general anaesthetic agents (halothane and ethanol) and succinylcholine were examined using preparations from 13 normal and four malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients. Erythrocyte fragility was determined by the degree of haemolysis induced in solutions of decreasing osmolarity of NaCl. Halothane caused haemolysis of erythrocytes in an isoosmolar solution, being more potent at 42 degrees C than at 32 degrees C. Haemolysis produced by an hypoosmolar medium or halothane was potentiated by exogenously added phospholipase A2. Ethanol did not markedly alter the haemolysis of erythrocytes under conditions of decreasing osmolarity. Succinylcholine 10 mM did not significantly alter the susceptibility of erythrocytes to lysis by halothane. No differences in erythrocyte fragility were observed between preparations from normal and malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients under any of the conditions tested, despite the inclusion of malignant hyperthermia triggering agents in some instances. Although sampling a larger patient population might reveal slight differences between the groups, erythrocyte fragility tests do not appear to be useful in differentiating malignant hyperthermia susceptible from normal patients.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.