CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wynands, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wynands, J. E.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 34, 594-600, Copyright © 1987 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

The relationship between central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during aortic surgery

DM Ansley, JG Ramsay, DG Whalley, JM Bent, R Lisbona, V Derbekyan and JE Wynands
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec.

Twenty-three ASA physical status II-III patients scheduled for elective abdominal aortic surgery were studied preoperatively with multiple unit gated acquisition angiography (MUGA) scan to determine the resting left ventricular and right ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF and RVEF respectively). Intraoperatively pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and central venous pressure (CVP) were measured in each patient at five different time periods in the horizontal, 24 degrees head up, and 24 degrees head down table tilt positions. The correlation between absolute values and changes in PCWP and CVP, and the degree to which preoperative knowledge of LVEF and RVEF predicted these correlations were examined. Resting LVEF ranged from 0.1 to 0.84. Thirteen of the 23 patients failed to show significant correlation (p less than 0.05) between the absolute values of PCWP and CVP either before and/or after aortic crossclamp. When the correlation coefficients from this analysis were ranked against LVEF, there was a weak but significant correlation before aortic crossclamp (r = 0.41), but not after. The correlation between a change in PCWP and a change in CVP was significant for the 23 patients at all time intervals, before and after aortic crossclamp. However, the prediction of a change of PCWP value from a known change of CVP value ranged in accuracy from +/- 3 mmHg to +/- 12.5 mmHg. The study suggests that if the filling pressures of both ventricles need to be assessed during aortic surgery, then the PCWP and CVP must be independently measured.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.