CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, J. C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 35, 31-35, Copyright © 1988 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Postoperative vomiting following strabismus surgery in paediatric outpatients: spontaneous versus controlled ventilation

C Walsh, CE Smith, B Ryan, RC Polomeno and JC Bevan
Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal Children's Hospital, Quebec.

The study was designed to compare the frequency and severity of postoperative vomiting in paediatric out-patients receiving controlled ventilation (IPPV) or breathing spontaneously (SV) during anaesthesia for strabismus repair. One hundred and twenty unpremedicated children (ages 2-12 years) were studied in a randomized fashion. After intravenous induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation, patients breathed halothane 1-1.5 per cent inspired and N2O 66 per cent in O2 spontaneously (n = 60), or received IPPV, halothane 0.5-1 per cent, N2O 66 per cent, and pancuronium 0.05 mg.kg-1, which was reversed with neostigmine and atropine (n = 60). The incidence of vomiting with SV was 50 per cent (95 per cent confidence limits: 34.5-65.5 per cent) compared with 40 per cent (24.5-55.5 per cent) with IPPV (p greater than 0.25). Patients in the SV group experiencing emesis had longer operations than those not vomiting (mean +/- SEM = 1.5 +/- 0.1 vs 1.2 +/- 0.1 hours, p less than 0.005). This was not the case with IPPV. There was no correlation between age, sex, duration of surgery, or number of extraocular muscles repaired, and frequency or severity of vomiting or time to discharge. No significant advantage was afforded by IPPV over SV in the present study.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C.-R. Cheng, D. I. Sessler, and C. C. Apfel
Does Neostigmine Administration Produce a Clinically Important Increase in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting?
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1349 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.