CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKay, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKay, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, W. H.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 35, 265-269, Copyright © 1988 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Critical incidents detected by pulse oximetry during anaesthesia

WP McKay and WH Noble
Department of Anaesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario.

The Critical Incident Technique was used to study anaesthetics given in a major tertiary care teaching hospital in order to define indications for monitoring with a pulse oximeter during anaesthesia. Anaesthetists were asked to use a pulse oximeter in every case and trained to report Critical Incidents in order to determine if the oximeter can shorten the time to detection of these events. Four thousand seven hundred and ninety-seven anaesthetics were given during a four-month period in 1986-87. A Critical Incident was recorded when an unexpected physiologic deterioration requiring intervention by the anaesthetist to prevent a likely bad outcome was signalled first by the pulse oximeter. Critical Incidents were classified by patient characteristics, physiologic change, type of anaesthetic, and the type, length, and place of surgery. Reports were received in 65 per cent of cases, and a Critical Incident occurred in 191 (six per cent) of these. Desaturation was the commonest physiologic change (151) and was further classified as to severity (mild 85-94 per cent saturation, moderate 75-84 per cent, and severe 75 per cent). Desaturations during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia were milder but more frequent than those in the induction or emergence phases. There were no severe desaturations in elderly patients or those receiving regional anaesthesia. No group was free of Critical Incidents. Since undetected hypoxaemia may lead to disastrous complications we recommend that a pulse oximeter be used for every anaesthetic.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. P. Thompson and R. P. Mahajan
Monitoring the monitors--beyond risk management.
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2006; 97(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
W. L. Hennrikus, R. C. Mapes, M. W. Bratton, and J. M. Lapoint
Lateral Traction During Shoulder Arthroscopy: Its Effect on Tissue Perfusion Measured by Pulse Oximetry
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1995; 23(4): 444 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.