CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlech, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schlech, W. F., 3rd

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 35, S46-S51, Copyright © 1988 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

The risk of infection in anaesthetic practice

WF Schlech 3rd
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Infectious hazards to anaesthesia personnel are real but the appropriate use of immunization, universal blood and body fluid precautions, and respiratory precautions where appropriate, should minimize the risk of infection at work. In particular, the resistance of physicians to immunization, especially to hepatitis B, needs to be changed. Protection against other blood-borne pathogens for which immunization is not available, such as HIV, may also depend on the willingness of anaesthesia personnel to accept and carry out recommendations for universal blood and body fluid precautions. Regulatory agencies and compensation boards are likely to look closely at adherence to established guidelines when determining benefits for work-related infections. Complaints that the routine use of gloves interferes with anaesthetic practice are frequent but unacceptable in the current climate and it behooves the profession to ensure that compliance with currently accepted infection control guidelines is complete.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.