CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaghadia, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaghadia, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, L. C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 35, 591-598, Copyright © 1988 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Evaluation of a postocclusive reactive circulatory hyperaemia (PORCH) test for the assessment of ulnar collateral circulation

H Vaghadia, MT Schechter, SB Sheps and LC Jenkins
Department of Anaesthesia, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia.

This prospective double-blind study compared Doppler assessment of the ulnar collateral circulation with the Allen's test and a postocclusive reactive circulatory hyperaemia (PORCH) test in 144 patients (288 hands). The PORCH test involves inflation of a blood pressure cuff on the upper arm to a supra systolic (+50 mmHg) pressure for two minutes. Prior to cuff deflation, both radial and ulnar arteries are occluded at the wrist; the cuff is then deflated and a 15-second period allowed so as to restore blood flow down to the wrist. Ulnar artery compression is now released and the time to revascularization measured. Fifty-eight per cent of hands with an abnormal Allen's test had a normal ulnar collateral circulation. Results of Allen's test were not significantly affected by patients' sex or smoking status (p greater than 0.1) but there was a significant difference (p = 0.001) in the false positive rates between patients over 40 years of age (0.2) and those under 40 years of age (0.03). Results of the PORCH test were not significantly affected by patients' age, sex or smoking status (p greater than 0.1). With a revascularisation time of 19 sec as a "cut off" for ulnar abnormality the PORCH test, unlike the Allen's test, was perfectly predictive of an abnormal ulnar collateral circulation and had no false positives.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.