CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by Seyone, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chung, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by Seyone, C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 36, 382-387, Copyright © 1989 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of perioperative mental function after general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia with intravenous sedation

FF Chung, A Chung, RH Meier, E Lautenschlaeger and C Seyone
Department of Anaesthesia, Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

This study compared the postoperative mental function in 44 elderly patients following general anaesthesia (GA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA) with sedation for transurethral resection of prostate. The Mini-Mental State (MMS) was done preoperatively and postoperatively at six hours, one day, three days, five days and one month. The geriatric mental status examination was performed preoperatively and one month after the anaesthetic. There was no significant intergroup difference in the MMS score in the preoperative, six hours, one day, three days, five days and 30 days postoperative scores between the GA and SA with sedation groups. A significant intragroup difference between preoperative and postoperative MMS score was detected in the GA group (P less than 0.02) and in the SA group with sedation (P less than 0.03). In the GA group, the significant decrease in MMS score occurred at 6 h postoperatively (P less than 0.002) whereas in the SA group with sedation, MMS score also decreased significantly at 6 h (P less than 0.005). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in perioperative mental function between the general and spinal anaesthetic groups when supplemental IV sedation was given. In both groups, perioperative mental function decreased significantly at 6 h postoperatively.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
G. L. Bryson and A. Wyand
Evidence-based clinical update: General anesthesia and the risk of delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: [Mise a jour clinique fondee sur des donnees probantes : l'anesthesie generale et le risque de delire et de dysfonctionnement cognitif postoperatoire].
Can J Anesth, July 1, 2006; 53(7): 669 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. J. Cook and G. A. Rooke
Priorities in Perioperative Geriatrics
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1823 - 1836.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. Wong, D. Song, H. Blanshard, D. Grady, and F. Chung
Titration of isoflurane using BIS index improves early recovery of elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries : [Le titrage de l'isoflurane a l'aide du BIS peut hater la recuperation des patients ages en chirurgie orthopedique]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2002; 49(1): 13 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Rodgers, N. Walker, S Schug, A McKee, H Kehlet, A van Zundert, D Sage, M Futter, G Saville, T Clark, et al.
Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials
BMJ, December 16, 2000; 321(7275): 1493 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
F. E. McHardy, J. Fortier, F. Chung, A. Krishnathas, and S. I. Marshall
A comparison of midazolam, alfentanil and propofol for sedation in oupatient intraocular surgery
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2000; 47(3): 211 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.