CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crosby, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crosby, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, S.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 36, 445-447, Copyright © 1989 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Failure of a lidocaine test dose to identify subdural placement of an epidural catheter

ET Crosby and S Halpern
Department of Anaesthesia, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario.

We report the failure of a test dose of 3 ml lidocaine 1.5 per cent with 15 micrograms epinephrine to identify subdural placement of an epidural catheter in a parturient. Thirty-five minutes after injection of 13 ml lidocaine 1.5 per cent, intended to provide epidural analgesia, the patient developed an extensive sensory neural blockade. Some motor control was maintained and sympathetic block was incomplete. Blood pressure and oxygenation were easily supported with optimum positioning, fluids, ephedrine and oxygen by mask. The patient remained alert. The duration of neural blockade was approximately two hours. The patient underwent a second epidural for labour analgesia that was uneventful. There were no sequelae. Subdural injections are uncommon and unpredictable in their occurrence. Test doses do not consistently identify misplaced catheters. A negative response to a test dose does not guarantee that extensive neural blockade will not occur during epidural analgesia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Guay
The epidural test dose: a review.
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 921 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. Lena and R. Martin
Subdural placement of an epidural catheter detected by nerve stimulation: [Positionnement sous-dural d'un catheter epidural detecte par stimulation nerveuse et confirme par tomographie]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 618 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. C.H. Tsui, S. Gupta, D. Emery, and B. Finucane
Detection of subdural placement of epidural catheter using nerve stimulation
Can J Anesth, May 1, 2000; 47(5): 471 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.