CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisenkraft, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Papatestas, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisenkraft, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Papatestas, A. E.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 37, 301-306, Copyright © 1990 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Sensitivity to vecuronium in myasthenia gravis: a dose-response study

JB Eisenkraft, WJ Book and AE Papatestas
Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, City University of New York, NY 10029-6574.

A cumulative dose plus infusion technique and integrated EMG monitoring of the first dorsal interosseous muscle were used to determine the potency of vecuronium in 20 normal patients and in ten patients with myasthenia gravis under thiamylal, N2O, O2, fentanyl anaesthesia. The mean (+/- SEM) values for ED50, ED90, and ED95 in the normal patients were 19 +/- 1, 31 +/- 1 and 36 +/- 2 micrograms.kg-1, respectively. Myasthenic patients showed increased sensitivity to vecuronium, the mean values for ED50, ED90, and ED95 were 10 +/- 2, 17 +/- 2 and 20 +/- 3 micrograms.kg-1, being 50, 55 and 56 per cent of normal, respectively. We did not demonstrate a difference in sensitivity to vecuronium between those myasthenic patients who received pyridostigmine preoperatively and those who did not, nor among those chronically treated with corticosteroids, compared with those who were not.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Basaranoglu, V. Erden, H. Delatioglu, and H. Itoh
Anesthesia of a Patient with Cured Myasthenia Gravis * Response
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1842 - 1843.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. De Haes, J. H. Proost, J. B. M. Kuks, D. C. van den Tol, and J. M. K. H. Wierda
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Rocuronium in Myasthenic Patients Is Improved by Taking into Account the Number of Unbound Acetylcholine Receptors
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2002; 95(3): 588 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H. Itoh, K. Shibata, and S. Nitta
Difference in sensitivity to vecuronium between patients with ocular and generalized myasthenia gravis
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2001; 87(6): 885 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. F. Dunsire, S. G. Clarke, and J. J. Stedmon
Undiagnosed myasthenia gravis unmasked by neuromuscular blockade
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 727 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.