CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, B.
Right arrow Articles by Abouleish, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Butler, B.
Right arrow Articles by Abouleish, E

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 37, 438-439, Copyright © 1990 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Loss of resistance technique for locating the epidural space: evaluation of glass and plastic syringes

BD Butler, RD Warters, JR Elk, I Davies and E Abouleish
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030.

Location of the epidural space in epidural anaesthesia usually involves the measurement of loss of resistance using glass or plastic syringes. In the present study two varieties of glass syringe and one plastic type were evaluated to determine the resistive forces associated with plunger movement. The mean static (fs) and dynamic (fd) forces for polished glass syringes having a ground plunger only were fs = 0.47 X 10(-3) +/- 0.22 X 10(-3) N and fd = 0.37 X 10(-3) +/- 0.19 X 10(-3) N and for polished glass syringes having a ground barrel and plunger were fs = 0.43 X 10(-3) +/- 0.16 X 10(-3) N and fd = 0.38 X 10(-3) +/- 0.15 X 10(-3) N. Each of these values was significantly lower (P less than 0.5) than those for plastic syringes fs = 2.22 X 10(-3) +/- 0.48 X 10(-3) N and fd = 1.46 X 10(-3) +/- 0.37 X 10(-3) N. It is concluded that glass syringes are favoured over plastic for locating the epidural space because frictional forces developed with glass syringes were significantly lower than with plastic.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.