CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blaise, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Caille, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blaise, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Caille, G.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 38, 111-115, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Attenuation of contraction of isolated canine coronary arteries by enflurane and halothane

GA Blaise, JM Hughes, JC Sill, JN Buluran and G Caille
Department of Anesthesiology, Universite Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Contraction of vascular smooth muscle such as that existing in coronary arteries is regulated in part by Ca++ entry into cells via Ca++ channels. Volatile anaesthetics are known to attenuate agonist-induced coronary artery constriction. The purpose of this experiment was to determine if 1.5 MAC concentrations of halothane or enflurane attenuated contractions evoked by activation of one type of Ca++ channel--the potential operator channel. In the current experiment, potential operator channels were activated by depolarizing isolated canine coronary artery rings with high concentration of K+, causing Ca++ entry and vessel contraction. Rings without endothelium were suspended for isometric force measurement in organ chambers containing aerated Krebs-Ringer solution. Maximum response to Ca++ in rings depolarized with K+ was 120 +/- 5 per cent in untreated versus 101 +/- 3 per cent in rings treated with enflurane (P less than 0.01). The maximum response was 123 +/- 6 per cent in untreated versus 111 +/- 5 per cent during halothane administration (P less than 0.05). In contrast, nifedipine 10(-9) M depressed maximum contractions from 114 +/- 5 per cent to 37 +/- 4 per cent (P less than 0.01) and nifedipine 10(-8) M depressed contractions to 30 +/- 4 per cent (P less than 0.01). In a further series of experiments, sustained contractions were depressed by continued administration of the anaesthetics, indicating no loss of anaesthetic effect with time. The results indicate that 1.5 MAC halothane and enflurane attenuate contractions of canine coronary arteries evoked by depolarization and Ca++ entry through potential operated channels. However, neither halothane nor enflurane exhibited the marked depressant effect exerted by nifedipine.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.