CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abdulatif, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abdulatif, M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 38, 722-727, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Edrophonium priming alters the course of neuromuscular recovery from a pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade

M Naguib and M Abdulatif
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University.

This study was designed to investigate the effect of divided administration of edrophonium on the course of neuromuscular recovery from a pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade. During thiopentone-nitrous oxide-halothane anaesthesia 48 patients were given pipecuronium 70 micrograms.kg-1. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 12 in each) to receive either edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1 (Groups I and II) or edrophonium 0.75 mg.kg-1 (Groups III and IV). In Groups I and III (single-dose groups), edrophonium was administered as a single bolus dose. In Groups II and IV (divided-dose groups) edrophonium was administered as an initial dose of 0.25 mg.kg-1 followed three minutes later by either 0.75 or 0.50 mg.kg-1 respectively. Reversal was attempted at 20% spontaneous recovery of twitch height. Administration of edrophonium in divided doses (Groups II and IV) accelerated the reversal of the pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade. At ten minutes post-reversal, train-of-four (TOF) ratio recovery reached 0.75 or more in 12 (100%) and in ten (83%) patients in Groups II and IV respectively. Similarly, times to attain a TOF of 0.75 (SEM) were shorter in the divided-dose groups than in the single-dose groups (P less than 0.05), being 354.5 (38.7) and 398.3 (49.1) sec in Groups II and IV vs 705.4 (66.6) and 651.2 (54.3) sec in Groups I and III respectively. Time was counted from the first administration of edrophonium. It is concluded that administration of edrophonium in divided doses produced a faster reversal of residual pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade than single bolus administration. Also, administration in divided doses reduced the requirements of edrophonium needed for reversal of pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.