Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 38, 817-825, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Cerebrovascular responses to carbon dioxide in children anaesthetized with halothane and isoflurane

JE Leon and B Bissonnette
Department of Anaesthesia, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

To determine the effects of isoflurane and halothane on cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2, 30 children aged one to six years were anaesthetized with isoflurane or halothane in an air and oxygen mixture with an FIO2 of 0.3. The end-tidal concentrations (0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) or 1.0 MAC) of isoflurane or halothane were age-adjusted. After achieving a steady-state at both 0.5 MAC and 1.0 MAC isoflurane and halothane, the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PETCO2) was randomly adjusted to 20, 40, or 60 mmHg. Cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and the cerebrovascular resistance index (RI+) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) were measured by a transcranial Doppler monitor. Three measurements of CBFV and RI+ were obtained at each PETCO2 and isoflurane or halothane concentration. Any rise in the PETCO2 caused an increase in CBFV during both 0.5 MAC (r2 = 0.99 and 0.99) and 1.0 MAC (r2 = 0.96 and 0.95) isoflurane and halothane anaesthesia, respectively (P less than 0.05). The CBFV for isoflurane increased as PETCO2 increased from 20 to 60 mmHg for both 0.5 MAC and 1.0 MAC (P less than 0.05). The CBFV for halothane increased as PETCO2 increased from 20 to 40 mmHg for both 0.5 MAC and 1.0 MAC halothane (P less than 0.05), but did not change as PETCO2 increased from 40 to 60 mmHg for both 0.5 MAC and 1.0 MAC halothane. The RI+ showed an inverse relationship with CBFV at each PETCO2 for 0.5 MAC (r2 = 0.98 and 0.99) and 1.0 MAC (r2 = 0.76 and 0.53) isoflurane and halothane, respectively (P less than 0.05). The CBFV did not differ significantly between 0.5 and 1.0 MAC isoflurane and halothane at corresponding PETCO2 values. The cerebrovascular response to CO2 at 20 mmHg between 0.5 MAC and 1.0 MAC halothane was not significantly different. These data strongly suggest that isoflurane and halothane in doses up to 1.0 MAC do not affect the cerebrovascular reactivity of the MCA to CO2 in anaesthetized, healthy children.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Karsli, I. Luginbuehl, and B. Bissonnette The Cerebrovascular Response to Hypocapnia in Children Receiving Propofol Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1049 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Karsli, E. Wilson-Smith, I. Luginbuehl, and B. Bissonnette The Effect of Nitrous Oxide on Cerebrovascular Reactivity to Carbon Dioxide in Children During Propofol Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2003; 97(3): 694 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Wilson-Smith, C. Karsli, I. Luginbuehl, and B. Bissonnette Effect of nitrous oxide on cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide in children during sevoflurane anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2003; 91(2): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. A. Luginbuehl, C. Karsli, and B. Bissonnette Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide is preserved during hypocapnia in children anesthetized with 1.0 MAC, but not with 1.5 MAC desflurane: [La reactivite cerebrovasculaire au gaz carbonique est conservee pendant l'hypocapnie chez des enfants anesthesies avec 1,0 CAM, mais non avec 1,5 CAM, de desflurane] Can J Anesth, February 1, 2003; 50(2): 166 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Karsli, I. Luginbuehl, M. Farrar, and B. Bissonnette Propofol decreases cerebral blood flow velocity in anesthetized children: [Le propofol diminue la vitesse circulatoire cerebrale chez les enfants anesthesies] Can J Anesth, October 1, 2002; 49(8): 830 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Rowney, R. Fairgrieve, and B. Bissonnette Cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity in children anaesthetized with sevoflurane Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2002; 88(3): 357 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, R. T. Protheroe, and J. M. Handel Tetanus: a review of the literature Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2001; 87(3): 477 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]