CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froese, N.
Right arrow Articles by Friesen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Froese, N.
Right arrow Articles by Friesen, R.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 38, 931-934, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Measurement of cardiac output--transtracheal Doppler versus thermodilution

N Froese and R Friesen
Department of Anesthesia, University of Manitoba, Faculty of Medicine, Winnipeg.

The ABCOM 1 transtracheal Doppler (TTD) has been developed as a non-invasive cardiac output monitor. With this device, cardiac output is continuously calculated from ascending aortic blood flow velocity and aortic diameter obtained via an ultrasound transducer incorporated into the tip of an endotracheal tube. We evaluated the clinical use of the ABCOM 1 monitor and compared cardiac outputs obtained using the TTD system with simultaneous thermodilution (TD) measurements. We found the operation of the ABCOM 1 monitor to be difficult and time-consuming. In our operating rooms, acceptable Doppler signal quality was difficult to obtain. There was no correlation between 36 simultaneously obtained TTD and TD cardiac output measurements. The average difference between measurement techniques and the limits of agreement were unacceptably large (mean difference = 3.04 L.min-1, mean +/- 2 SD = -6.04 to 12.48 L.min-1). Separately analyzing only those measurements during which Doppler signal quality was adequate did not improve agreement between TTD and TD measurements. On the basis of these findings, TTD cannot be recommended as a clinical cardiac output measurement technique.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. S. Goodchild, A. Robinson, and R. Nadeson
Antinociceptive properties of neurosteroids IV: pilot study demonstrating the analgesic effects of alphadolone administered orally to humans
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 528 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.