CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, A.
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, A.
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 39, 90-94, Copyright © 1992 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Flow resistance of coaxial breathing systems: investigation of a circuit disconnect

A Sinclair and J van Bergen
Research and Development Section, Health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

A clinical incident involving an undetected disconnection occurred during the use of a CPRAM coaxial breathing circuit. The flow resistance of this circuit was evaluated and compared with that of a Bain circuit to determine the factors involved. A differential pressure transducer was used to monitor the pressure drop across each circuit during simulation of controlled ventilation with a fresh gas flow of 6 L.min-1. An Ohio V5 anaesthesia ventilator was adjusted to different flow rates and tidal volumes and a test lung simulated an airway resistance of 2.7 cm H2O.L-1.sec and a compliance of 0.05 L.cmH2O-1. Absolute pressure at the ventilator was also monitored when the circuit was disconnected from the test lung. The CPRAM circuit displayed a pressure drop from the ventilator to the endotracheal tube of 6.3 cm H2O at 60 L.min-1, about twice that found with the Bain. A disconnection at the tracheal connector produced an absolute pressure at the ventilator of 9.6 cm H2O with the CPRAM and 5.5 cm H2O with the Bain. Since the ventilator low pressure alarm was preset to 9.2 cm H2O, the alarm provided a warning with the Bain but not the CPRAM. The elevated flow resistance of the CPRAM circuit was attributed to a restriction in the flow area at the patient end of the circuit. Capnographs or adjustable low-pressure alarms provide more reliable monitoring for breathing circuit disconnects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Ghai, J. K. Makkar, and A. Bhatia
Hypercarbia and arrhythmias resulting from faulty bain circuit: a report of two cases.
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1903 - 1904.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. S. Jellish, T. Nolan, and B. Kleinman
Hypercapnia Related to a Faulty Adult Co-Axial Breathing Circuit
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 973 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.