CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gosteli, P.
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gosteli, P.
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 39, 337-341, Copyright © 1992 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

[Peridural anesthesia for surgery of the ankle and foot: effect of the sitting position]

P Gosteli, Z Gamulin, E Van Gessel and A Forster
Departement d'Anesthesiologie, Hopital Cantonal Universitaire, Geneve, Suisse.

The effects of the sitting position on the quality of both sensory and motor blockade of segments L5 and S1 and the haemodynamic consequences during epidural anaesthesia were studied on 39 patients undergoing ankle or foot surgery. After insertion of an epidural catheter with the patient in the lateral position, 19 patients were kept sitting for 15 min following the injection of the local anaesthetic and 20 remained supine for the duration of anaesthesia (control group). All patients received a dose of 20 ml of 1.73% carbonated lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000. The quality and time of onset of the sensory blockade for segments L1-S2 as well as its cephalad spread were comparable in both groups. Fourteen patients of the sitting group achieved motor blockade of more than three of five myotomes compared with five patients in the supine group (P less than 0.001). The maximum decrease in mean arterial pressure occurred sooner in the sitting group (14 +/- 9 min) than in the control group (21 +/- 10 min; P less than 0.01) and was more severe (-24 +/- 10% vs -16 +/- 10% respectively; P less than 0.05). Our results indicate that placing the patient in the sitting position for 15 min after inducing epidural anaesthesia does not influence caudal sensory blockade but does increase the depth of motor blockade.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.