CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cruise, C.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cruise, C.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, P.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 39, 563-568, Copyright © 1992 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of meperidine and pancuronium for the treatment of shivering after cardiac surgery

C Cruise, J MacKinnon, J Tough and P Houston
Department of Anaesthesia, Toronto Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

Shivering after cardiac surgery can produce adverse haemodynamic and metabolic sequelae. In this study, the metabolic effects of shivering and the efficacy of treatment with meperidine or pancuronium were studied, using a metabolic cart, in 61 patients who had undergone cardiac surgery. The patients received premedication with morphine, perphenazine and diazepam or lorazepam, and were anaesthetised with fentanyl or sufentanil and diazepam. Muscle relaxation was achieved with pancuronium. Patients were monitored with a radial arterial line, pulmonary artery catheter and oesophageal and urinary bladder temperature probes. Rewarming to an oesophageal temperature of 38 degrees C was achieved before the termination of CPB and was maintained for a minimum of 15 min reperfusion time. Every 15 min after surgery, the patients' temperature at three sites (pulmonary artery, oesophagus, bladder) and shivering scores were monitored. Hourly measurements were made of haemodynamic variables (MAP, PAOP, CVP, SVR, PVR, CI), carbon dioxide production, oxygen consumption and respiratory quotient. If the patient shivered, the measurements were recorded prior to drug treatment and repeated 30 min later following randomization to either: meperidine 0.25 mg.kg-1 (Group 1), meperidine 0.5 mg.kg-1 (Group 2) or pancuronium 0.06 mg.kg-1 intravenously (Group 3). Thirty-two patients shivered and mean VO2 and VCO2 values were greater in the shivering group than in the nonshivering patients (VO2 334.8 +/- 17.6 vs. 240.5 +/- 8.8 ml.min-1; VCO2 238.8 +/- 17.2 vs 199.2 +/- 8.4 ml.min-1, P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Kranke, L. H. Eberhart, N. Roewer, and M. R. Tramer
Pharmacological Treatment of Postoperative Shivering: A Quantitative Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2002; 94(2): 453 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.