CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lavoie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Colas, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lavoie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Colas, M. J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 39, 583-586, Copyright © 1992 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Axillary plexus block using a peripheral nerve stimulator: single or multiple injections

J Lavoie, R Martin, JP Tetrault, DJ Cote and MJ Colas
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Sherbrooke, P. Que., Canada.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was undertaken to evaluate the success rates of axillary brachial plexus block performed with the help of a peripheral nerve stimulator when either one, two or four of the major nerves of the brachial plexus were located. Seventy-five patients undergoing upper limb surgery were randomly allocated to one of the following five groups according to the nerve and number of nerves to be located; G-1: musculo-cutaneous, radial, median and ulnar nerves; G-2: musculo-cutaneous plus one of the other three nerves; G-3: radial nerve; G-4: median nerve; G-5: ulnar nerve. The sensory block was evaluated before surgery and cutaneous anaesthesia was considered to be present when the needles of a Wartenberg Pinwheel were no longer felt in all the dermatomes of the nerves implicated in the surgical site. Otherwise, the block was considered to need completion before surgery. Only one out of the 15 patients in G-1 and G-2 needed completion of their block before surgery whereas seven out of 15 for G-3 and eight out of 15 for G-4 and G-5 needed completion of their block (P less than 0.01). We conclude that when performing an axillary block with the help of a peripheral nerve stimulator, stimulation of the musculo-cutaneous nerve and one other nerve or stimulation of all four major nerves of the brachial plexus gives a higher success rate than stimulation of only one nerve, whether the stimulated nerve is the median, radial or ulnar.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Q. H. De Tran, A. Clemente, J. Doan, and R. J. Finlayson
Brachial plexus blocks: a review of approaches and techniques: [Les blocs du plexus brachial : compte-rendu des approches et techniques]
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2007; 54(8): 662 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Pranevicius, J. K. Park, E. Cowart, L. Golden, A. Rucinskas, and O. Pranevicius
Using Two Needles for Multiple Injection Nerve Blocks Avoids Manipulation After Local Anesthetic Injection
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1308 - 1308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Fuzier, O. Fourcade, A. Pianezza, M.-L. Gilbert, V. Bounes, and M. Olivier
A comparison between double-injection axillary brachial plexus block and midhumeral block for emergency upper limb surgery.
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1856 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Fuzier, O. Fourcade, V. Fuzier, S. Arnold, J. Torrie, and M. Olivier
The Feasibility and Efficacy of Short Axillary Catheters for Emergency Upper Limb Surgery: A Descriptive Series of 120 Cases
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 610 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
N. S. Sandhu, C. S. Bahniwal, and L. M. Capan
Feasibility of an Infraclavicular Block With a Reduced Volume of Lidocaine With Sonographic Guidance
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Serradell, R. Herrero, J. A. Villanueva, J. A. Santos, J. M. Moncho, and J. Masdeu
Comparison of three different volumes of mepivacaine in axillary plexus block using multiple nerve stimulation{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 519 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Sia, A. Lepri, M. C. Campolo, and R. Fiaschi
Four-Injection Brachial Plexus Block Using Peripheral Nerve Stimulator: A Comparison Between Axillary and Humeral Approaches
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. S. Sandhu and L. M. Capan
Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2002; 89(2): 254 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. R. Brown and G. C. Parker
The Use of a ""Reverse"" Axis (Axillary-Interscalene) Block in a Patient Presenting with Fractures of the Left Shoulder and Elbow
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1618 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, G. Fanelli, P. Beccaria, L. Magistris, A. Albertin, and G. Torri
The Effects of Single or Multiple Injections on the Volume of 0.5% Ropivacaine Required for Femoral Nerve Blockade
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2001; 93(1): 183 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. R. M. Janzen, A. J. Vipond, D. J. Bush, and P. M. Hopkins
A Comparison of 1% Prilocaine with 0.5% Ropivacaine for Outpatient-Based Surgery Under Axillary Brachial Plexus Block
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2001; 93(1): 187 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. M. Coventry, K. F. Barker, and M. Thomson
Comparison of two neurostimulation techniques for axillary brachial plexus blockade
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2001; 86(1): 80 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Carles, A. Pulcini, P. Macchi, P. Duflos, M. Raucoules-Aime, and D. Grimaud
An Evaluation of the Brachial Plexus Block at the Humeral Canal Using a Neurostimulator (1417 Patients): The Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Criteria of Failure
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 194 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Sia, M. Bartoli, A. Lepri, O. Marchini, and P. Ponsecchi
Multiple-Injection Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparison of Two Methods of Nerve Localization-Nerve Stimulation Versus Paresthesia
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 647 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, L. Magistris, G. Fanelli, P. Beccaria, G. Cappelleri, G. Aldegheri, and G. Torri
Small-Dose Clonidine Prolongs Postoperative Analgesia After Sciatic-Femoral Nerve Block with 0.75% Ropivacaine for Foot Surgery
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2000; 91(2): 388 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, G. Fanelli, P. Beccaria, G. Cappelleri, M. Berti, G. Aldegheri, and G. Torri
The Effects of the Single or Multiple Injection Technique on the Onset Time of Femoral Nerve Blocks with 0.75% Ropivacaine
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2000; 91(1): 181 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Fanelli, A. Casati, P. Garancini, and G. Torri
Nerve Stimulator and Multiple Injection Technique for Upper and Lower Limb Blockade: Failure Rate, Patient Acceptance, and Neurologic Complications
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 1999; 88(4): 847 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, G. Fanelli, V. Cedrati, M. Berti, G. Aldegheri, and G. Torri
Pulmonary Function Changes After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia with 0.5% and 0.75% Ropivacaine: A Double-Blinded Comparison with 2% Mepivacaine
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 1999; 88(3): 587 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.