CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pasquariello, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pasquariello, C. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 40, 1049-1052, Copyright © 1993 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Tracheal tube leak test--is there inter-observer agreement?

RE Schwartz, SA Stayer and CA Pasquariello
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Although the leak test is recommended as a method of assessing the appropriate size of uncuffed endotracheal tubes for use in children, the reproducibility of this test has not been validated. Patients from newborn to ten years of age requiring tracheal intubation for elective surgery were studied. The endotracheal tube size was calculated using the formula: (age + 16) divided by 4 for patients > or = two years of age and at the discretion of the attending anaesthetist for patients < two years of age. After the induction of anaesthesia and administration of a nondepolarizing muscle relaxant, the patient's trachea was intubated and mid-tracheal placement was confirmed. Two of the three staff anaesthetists participating in the study assessed the leak pressure consecutively. Each participant performed a single leak determination. The leak pressure was determined as follows: the patient was supine with the head in a neutral position, fresh gas flowed into the breathing circuit at 5 L.min-1, a stethoscope was placed on the skin over the larynx and the pressure relief valve was completely closed. Pressure slowly increased in the breathing circuit until an audible leak occurred around the tracheal tube. The inter-observer difference was calculated in 212 patients. The absolute value of the difference between that of two observers increased as the mean leak pressure increased. However, the variation between observers expressed as a percent of the absolute measurement remained constant. An average variance in measurement of 38% was found at both low and high leak pressures. In conclusion, we found considerable variation between two experienced observers in assessing leak pressures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Lakhal, X. Delplace, J.-P. Cottier, F. Tranquart, X. Sauvagnac, C. Mercier, J. Fusciardi, and M. Laffon
The Feasibility of Ultrasound to Assess Subglottic Diameter
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 611 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.