| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 40, 1148-1154, Copyright © 1993 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
D Schwender, S Klasing, C Madler, E Poppel and K Peter
Institute of Anaesthesiology, University of Munich, FRG.
Midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) reflect primary cortical processing of auditory stimuli. The effects of benzodiazepines on MLAEP have not yet been studied. We examined the effects of intravenous induction of general anaesthesia using the benzodiazepines midazolam, diazepam and flunitrazepam on MLAEP in 30 patients scheduled for minor gynaecological procedures. Anaesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.2-0.3 mg.kg-1, Group I, n = 10), diazepam (0.3-0.4 mg.kg-1, Group II, n = 10) or flunitrazepam (0.03-0.04 mg.kg-1, Group III, n = 10). Auditory-evoked potentials were recorded before and five to ten minutes after induction of general anaesthesia. Latencies of the peak V, Na, Pa, Nb and Pl (ms) and amplitudes Na/Pa, Pa/Nb and Nb/P1 (microV) were measured. In the awake state, MLAEP had high peak to peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform. After induction of anaesthesia there was no or only a small increase in latencies of the peaks Na, Pa, Nb and P1, which was significant only for P1 in the midazolam group. Amplitudes Na/Pa, Pa/Nb and Nb/P1 decreased only slightly and which reached statistical significance only for Na/Pa in the flunitrazepam group. The MLAEPs do not change markedly in amplitude or latency during induction of general anaesthesia with benzodiazepines. Primary cortical processing of auditory stimuli seems to be preserved under benzodiazepines. This may be seen in connection with cases of intraoperative awareness and especially the perception of auditory stimuli during anaesthetic regimens where benzodiazepines are used to suppress consciousness.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Rodriguez Human Auditory Evoked Potentials in the Assessment of Brain Function During Major Cardiovascular Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2004; 8(2): 85 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Bell, D. C. Smith, R. Allen, and M. E. Lutman Recording the middle latency response of the auditory evoked potential as a measure of depth of anaesthesia. A technical note Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2004; 92(3): 442 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Recart, I. Gasanova, P. F. White, T. Thomas, B. Ogunnaike, M. Hamza, and A. Wang The Effect of Cerebral Monitoring on Recovery After General Anesthesia: A Comparison of the Auditory Evoked Potential and Bispectral Index Devices with Standard Clinical Practice Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1667 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kochs, C. J. Kalkman, C. Thornton, D. Newton, P. Bischoff, H. Kuppe, J. Abke, E. Konecny, W. Nahm, and G. Stockmanns Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Responses and Electroencephalographic Derived Variables Do Not Predict Movement to Noxious Stimulation During 1 Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration Isoflurane/Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., June 1, 1999; 88(6): 1412 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Kelly, F. Walsh, G. S. Norman, and A. J. Cunningham The Effects of Midazolam on Pure Tone Audiometry, Speech Audiometry, and Audiological Reaction Times in Human Volunteers Anesth. Analg., May 1, 1999; 88(5): 1064 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |