CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 40, 127-132, Copyright © 1993 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Pharmacodynamic behaviour of rocuronium in the elderly

DR Bevan, P Fiset, P Balendran, JC Law-Min, A Ratcliffe and F Donati
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

This study compared the potency and time course of action of rocuronium (ORG 9426) in elderly and young patients during nitrous oxide-opioid anaesthesia. One hundred ASA physical status I-II patients (60, aged 65-80 yr, and 40, aged 20-45 yr) were studied by measuring the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis in response to train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. After induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone and maintenance with N2O/O2 and fentanyl, rocuronium 120, 160, 200, or 240 micrograms.kg-1 was administered to determine dose-response curves. When maximum block had been obtained, further rocuronium to a total of 300 micrograms.kg-1 was given. Additional doses of 100 micrograms.kg-1 were administered when the first twitch height (T1) had recovered to 25% control. At the end of surgery neuromuscular blockade was allowed, whenever possible, to recover spontaneously until T1 was 90% of control before administration of neostigmine. There was no difference in the potency of rocuronium in the elderly and the younger patients. The ED50 was 196 +/- 8 (SEE for the mean) in elderly, vs 215 +/- 17 micrograms.kg-1 in young patients (NS). When individual cumulative dose-response curves were constructed, the ED50 was 203 +/- 7 (SEM) and 201 +/- 10 micrograms.kg-1 in the elderly and the young respectively (NS). However, the onset of maximum neuromuscular block was slower in the elderly 3.7 +/- 1.1 (SD) vs 3.1 +/- 0.9 min, P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Claudius, H. Karacan, and J. Viby-Mogensen
Prolonged residual paralysis after a single intubating dose of rocuronium
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 514 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. A. Dahaba, S. I. Perelman, D. M. Moskowitz, H. L. Bennett, A. Shander, K. Oettl, G. Reibnegger, and H. Metzler
Influence of acute normovolaemic haemodilution on the dose-response relationship, time-course of action and pharmacokinetics of rocuronium bromide
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2006; 97(4): 482 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
F. Donati
Cumulation and flexibility with infusions of neuromuscular blocking drugs
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2000; 47(10): 936 - 942.
[PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. F. Kopman, M. M. Klewicka, and G. G. Neuman
An Alternate Method for Estimating the Dose-Response Relationships of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2000; 90(5): 1191 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C. Motamed and F. Donati
Intubating conditions and blockade after mivacurium, rocuronium and their combination in young and elderly adults
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2000; 47(3): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.