CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watters, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hurtig, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watters, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hurtig, J. B.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 40, 314-319, Copyright © 1993 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia do not affect energy expenditure after major abdominal surgery

JM Watters, RJ March, D Desai, K Monteith and JB Hurtig
Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Civic Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

Our objective was to determine the effect of perioperative epidural anaesthesia and analgesia on the increase in energy expenditure which accompanies major elective abdominal surgery in a prospective, randomized study. Eight patients undergoing elective resections of the colon and/or rectum received general anaesthesia alone (nitrous oxide, oxygen, and isoflurane, supplemented with intravenous fentanyl to a maximum of 10 micrograms.kg-1), and 12 patients received perioperative epidural anaesthesia and analgesia using lidocaine (carbonated lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000, 20 ml over 30 min) and morphine (preservative-free morphine 0.10 mg.kg-1 after catheter insertion and 0.05 to 0.10 mg.kg-1 every 12 hr as needed until the morning following surgery) via a lower lumbar catheter in addition to general anaesthesia. Respiratory gas exchange was measured using a metabolic cart and canopy system early on the morning of surgery, six hours postoperatively, and on the first and second postoperative mornings. Parenteral analgesic administration (P < 0.001) and visual analogue pain scores (P < 0.05) were lower in the patients receiving epidural anaesthesia and time to first parenteral analgesia was longer (P < 0.005). Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, and energy expenditure increased after surgery (all P < 0.001) but were very similar in the two groups (all P > or = 0.8) before and after surgery. Despite substantial effects on postoperative pain, we conclude that oxygen consumption and energy expenditure following major abdominal surgery are not diminished by perioperative epidural anaesthesia and analgesia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
A. Rodgers, N. Walker, S Schug, A McKee, H Kehlet, A van Zundert, D Sage, M Futter, G Saville, T Clark, et al.
Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials
BMJ, December 16, 2000; 321(7275): 1493 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.