CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiesel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Easdown, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiesel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Easdown, L. J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 40, 607-611, Copyright © 1993 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Postdural puncture headache: a randomized prospective comparison of the 24 gauge Sprotte and the 27 gauge Quincke needles in young patients

S Wiesel, MJ Tessler and LJ Easdown
Department of Anaesthesia, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

This study was designed to compare the frequency of postdural puncture headaches (PDPH) using the 24 gauge Sprotte and the 27 gauge Quincke spinal needles in a population of patients less than 45 yr of age undergoing spinal anaesthesia for non-obstetrical surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive spinal anaesthesia with either the 24 gauge Sprotte spinal needle (n = 46) or the 27 gauge Quincke spinal needle (n = 47). Patients were interviewed on either postoperative day one or two and on postoperative day three. A PDPH was defined as a headache involving the occipital or frontal areas that is made worse when assuming either the sitting or standing position. Ninety-three patients were included in the analysis of data. The overall incidence of PDPH was 14% (13 of 93), and no difference was found between the Sprotte (15.2%) and Quincke (12.8%) needles. The distribution of the PDPHs by severity was not different between the two groups. None of the 13 patients with PDPHs required on epidural blood patch for relief of symptoms. Both the Sprotte needle and the Quincke needles were judged as easy to use and both required the same number of attempts in order to locate cerebrospinal fluid (first attempt successful: 73.9% versus 66%). Neither patient satisfaction nor the acceptability of spinal anaesthesia for a future procedure was adversely affected by the occurrence of a PDPH. The results of this study suggest that the risk of PDPH after spinal anaesthesia in young patients is similar using either the 24 gauge Sprotte or the 27 gauge Quincke spinal needle.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. K. Hatfield, S. J. Handrich, J. A. Willis, R. A. Beres, and G. X. Zaleski
Blood Patch Rates After Lumbar Puncture with Whitacre Versus Quincke 22- and 20-Gauge Spinal Needles
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1686 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.