CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, D. R.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 41, 1074-1080, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Reversal of doxacurium and pancuronium neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine in children

JC Bevan, JP Purday, EJ Reimer and DR Bevan
Department of Anaesthesia, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.

Recovery after doxacurium and pancuronium neuromuscular blockade and their acceleration by neostigmine have not been compared in children. Therefore, 60 paediatric surgical patients aged 2-10 yr (ASA 1-2) were studied. They were randomized to receive doxacurium 30 micrograms.kg-1 or pancuronium 70 micrograms.kg-1 iv during propofol, fentanyl, isoflurane and nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Electromyographic (EMG) responses of the adductor pollicis to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve were recorded every ten seconds using a Datex NMT monitor. Six patients in each relaxant group received neostigmine (0, 5, 10, 20 or 40 micrograms.kg-1) with atropine by random allocation when first twitch height (T1) had recovered to 25% of control. Spontaneous recovery after ten minutes was similar following doxacurium (mean +/- SEM values of 45.0 +/- 3.9 vs 49.5 +/- 10.0% for T1 and 25.2 +/- 3.8 vs 14.8 +/- 3.6% for TOF ratios). Dose-responses to neostigmine were calculated from the log dose vs logit of T1 or TOF ratio after ten minutes. Neostigmine-assisted recovery was not different in the two groups, with ED70 and ED90 doses for T1 of 14.3 +/- 1.8 and 25.7 +/- 2.7 micrograms.kg-1 for doxacurium and 12.5 +/- 1.7 and 25.3 +/- 2.3 micrograms.kg-1 for pancuronium. Time to recovery of TOF ratio to 70% after neostigmine 40 micrograms.kg-1 was 2.3 +/- 1.0 and 4.2 +/- 1.7 min (P = NS) following pancuronium and doxacurium, respectively. Adjusted recovery due to neostigmine alone (spontaneous recovery subtracted from the total) required two to three times higher doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.