| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 41, 1149-1155, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
OR Hung, C Bands, G Laney, D Drover, S Stevens and M MacSween
Department of Anaesthesia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Many patients claim to have drug allergies. However, the signs and symptoms of "allergic reactions" are seldom documented and the drug allergies are rarely properly assessed. The goal of this study was to determine the incidence of claimed "drug allergies" in a surgical population. After obtaining institutional approval, the study was carried out at five hospitals affiliated with Dalhousie University. Patients were interviewed by the investigators during the preoperative anaesthetic evaluation over six months and all signs and symptoms of drug reactions were recorded. The validity of the claimed allergy was based on the history. The allergies were assigned to one of three groups: (1) High probability of an allergic reaction: one or more of the signs and symptoms typical of an immunological reaction, with or without a family history, or a history of atopy; (ii) Low probability of an allergic reaction: signs and symptoms of the reaction were predictable reactions or side effects of the drug, without the occurrence of reactions mentioned above; or (iii) Unknown status: no information concerning the reaction of history was available. Of 1818 adult and paediatric patients (914 female/904 male) interviewed, 511 (28.1%) claimed to have one or more drug allergies (a total of 671 allergies). More women than men claimed to have drug allergies (60.3% vs 39.7%) and there was a positive correlation between age, number of medications and reported drug allergies. Antibiotics (50%), opioids (27%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (10%), and sedatives (5%) accounted for 92% of all claimed drug allergies. Overall, 50% of claimed allergies had a high probability of true allergic reactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. MacPherson, C. Willcox, C. Chow, and A. Wang Anaesthetist's responses to patients' self-reported drug allergies Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 634 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J Gilbar and A. M Ridge Inappropriate labelling of patients as opioid allergic Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, September 1, 2004; 10(3): 177 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J Gilbar and A. M Ridge History of opioid allergy: what significance? Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, September 1, 2004; 10(3): 183 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Blunk, M. Schmelz, S. Zeck, P. Skov, R. Likar, and W. Koppert Opioid-Induced Mast Cell Activation and Vascular Responses Is Not Mediated by {micro}-Opioid Receptors: An In Vivo Microdialysis Study in Human Skin Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |