CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Finegan, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Finegan, B. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 41, 1156-1160, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Comparison of selection of preoperative laboratory tests: the computer vs the anaesthetist

JM Davies, D Pagenkopf, K Todd, B Werry and BA Finegan
Department of Anaesthesia, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, AB.

HealthQuiz II (HQII) is a computerized history-taking device which can be used by patients before anaesthesia and surgery. HealthQuiz II provides a summary of symptoms, a modified ASA Classification, and a list of suggested laboratory tests. Developed at the University of Chicago, the device has not been evaluated in Canada. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative evaluation and selection of laboratory tests by a group of Canadian anaesthetists using traditional methods versus using HealthQuiz II. Twenty-seven anaesthetists from three (Western) Canadian University teaching hospitals participated in the study. The subjects were male, aged between 30-50 yr, trained in Canada and practicing in Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver. They were asked to self-evaluate and select laboratory tests and then to complete the HQII protocol, the day before a proposed mock operation. Results of this comparison showed that the ASA scores assigned by HQII were higher for 11 subjects and lower for two. Eight anaesthetists thought HQII asked questions which they omitted while five thought HQII overlooked items. Thirteen anaesthetists believed HQII would be a useful adjunct to their practice. Only ten anaesthetists requested any tests while HealthQuiz II suggested tests for 23 subjects, with an average of 1.9 tests/subject (anaesthetists) vs 5.4 tests/subject (HQII). The total cost of tests selected by anaesthetists was $272.15 in contrast with $1,513.20 for those suggested by HQII. We conclude that rationale for test selection may have contributed to the difference in number and costs of tests.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. A. Finegan, S. Rashiq, F. A. McAlister, and P. O'Connor
Selective ordering of preoperative investigations by anesthesiologists reduces the number and cost of tests: La demande selective de tests preoperatoires par les anesthesiologistes reduit le nombre et le cout des tests
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.