CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crosby, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gverzdys, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crosby, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gverzdys, C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 41, 192-197, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Epidural sufentanil does not attenuate the central haemodynamic effects of caesarean section performed under epidural anaesthesia

ET Crosby, GL Bryson, RD Elliott and C Gverzdys
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Ottawa, Ottawa General Hospital, Ontario.

The effect of sufentanil 30 micrograms added to the epidural local anaesthetic solutions used for anaesthesia during elective Caesarean section on central haemodynamic variables was studied. Haemodynamic measurements made by thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) monitoring were compared in 21 healthy parturients undergoing Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia with and without the addition of epidural sufentanil. The patients were randomized to control (Group C) and study (Group S) groups. Following iv prehydration, an epidural catheter was placed at the L2-3 or L3-4 interspace. After a negative test dose, in a double-blinded protocol, patients in Group S received sufentanil 30 micrograms (0.6 ml) in 4.4 ml lidocaine carbonate 2% with 5 micrograms.ml-1 epinephrine and those in Group C received 5 ml lidocaine carbonate 2% with epinephrine. Lidocaine carbonate 2% with 5 micrograms.ml-1 epinephrine was then titrated to establish an anaesthetic level of T4. Haemodynamic variables (heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac index, ejection fraction and end-diastolic index) were measured non-invasively, continuously throughout the perioperative period. There were no differences noted in haemodynamic measurements between the groups at any time perioperatively. However, differences occurred within the groups when compared with baseline values. Heart rate was increased in both groups intraoperatively. Cardiac index was increased throughout the intraoperative period in Group S but was less frequently elevated in Group C. Ejection fraction was increased throughout the perioperative period in Group S but not in Group C. End-diastolic index increased following iv preloading in both groups and returned to baseline with induction of epidural block.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.