CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinchak, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinchak, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, L.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 41, 206-212, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Waiting time after non-depolarizing relaxants alter muscle fasciculation response to succinylcholine

AC Pinchak, CE Smith, LS Shepard and L Patterson
Department of Anesthesiology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44109.

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants and waiting time on muscle fasciculations after succinylcholine in anaesthetized patients. Adult men and women, 60-80 kg, received pretreatment doses of atracurium 5 mg (n = 160), pancuronium 1 mg (n = 123), d-tubocurarine 3 mg (n = 97), or vecuronium 1 mg (n = 62). Waiting times between pretreatment and succinylcholine, 100 mg, ranged between 0.6 and 5 min. Data points (presence or absence of fasciculations and waiting time) were entered for each patient. Waiting time response curves were obtained between the logit transformation of the probability of no fasciculations and the log waiting time for each drug. Statistical differences between wait time response curves were determined by non-overlapping of the associated 95% confidence intervals. The frequency of muscle fasciculations was reduced with increased waiting time for all nondepolarizers tested. Following wait times of three, four and five minutes, the probability of not fasciculating was greatest with d-tubocurarine (90, 97 and 99%, respectively) and atracurium (89, 93 and 96%). Corresponding values for pancuronium were 70, 82 and 88% and for vecuronium were 74, 82 and 86%. Waiting times to prevent fasciculations in 80% and 90% of patients were shorter with d-tubocurarine (2.46 and 3.02 min, respectively) or atracurium (2.16 and 3.24 min) than pancuronium (3.77 and 5.35 min) or vecuronium (3.73 and 6.36 min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.