CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badner, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Komar, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badner, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Komar, W. E.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 41, 387-392, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Bupivacaine 0.125% improves continuous postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery

NH Badner, R Bhandari and WE Komar
Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

The addition of 0.125% and 0.25% bupivacaine to continuous postoperative epidural infusions of fentanyl, in a 10 micrograms.ml-1 concentration, were studied in 39 patients following abdominal or thoracic surgery in prospective, random, double-blind fashion. Patients received an initial bolus of 0.1 ml.kg-1 of the the study solution and an infusion of 6 ml.hr-1 which was titrated to maintain analgesia (VAS < 40). Assessments of pain (VAS), pulmonary function (pH, PaCO2), and bowel function (time to flatus or po fluids) were made until the second post-operative morning. There was a difference among the three groups in analgesia (means VAS scores) over time (P < 0.01), with the fentanyl-alone group producing less analgesia than the 0.125% bupivacaine group (P < 0.01). There was no difference in the average infusion rates, postoperative pulmonary function, or bowel function. The incidence of side effects including somnolence, nausea and vomiting, and pruritus was also similar. Fewer patients in the 0.125% bupivacaine group than in the 0.25% group developed a transient sensory loss to pinprick and ice (3 vs 10, P < 0.001). Four patients in both bupivacaine groups had leg weakness, those in the 0.125% were all a Bromage 1 score, while in the 0.25% group one had a Bromage 1, one a Bromage 2, and two Bromage 3 scores. The addition of 0.125% bupivacaine improves the analgesia of epidural infusions of fentanyl (10 microgms.ml(-1)) when used following abdominal or thoracic surgery and results in minimal sensorimotor disturbance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. S. Sinatra MD, J. Torres, and A. M. Bustos
Pain Management After Major Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Strategies and New Concepts
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2002; 10(2): 117 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. J. Kopacz, N. E. Sharrock, and H. W. Allen
A Comparison of Levobupivacaine 0.125%, Fentanyl 4 {micro}g/mL, or Their Combination for Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Major Orthopedic Surgery
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1497 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
E. Cohen
Postthoracotomy Pain Management
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1999; 3(3): 156 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. A. Scott, D. Blake, M. Buckland, R. Etches, R. Halliwell, C. Marsland, G. Merridew, D. Murphy, M. Paech, S. A. Schug, et al.
A Comparison of Epidural Ropivacaine Infusion Alone and in Combination with 1, 2, and 4 {micro}g/mL Fentanyl for Seventy-Two Hours of Postoperative Analgesia After Major Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 1999; 88(4): 857 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.