CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colonna-Romano, P.
Right arrow Articles by Braitman, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colonna-Romano, P.
Right arrow Articles by Braitman, L. E.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 41, 572-574, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Diagnostic accuracy of an intrathecal test dose in epidural analgesia

P Colonna-Romano, R Padolina, N Lingaraju and LE Braitman
Department of Anesthesiology, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192.

The authors evaluated the accuracy of an intrathecal test dose (TD) to rule out unintentional subarachnoid injection in a prospective and double-blind study. Twenty-nine unmedicated patients scheduled to receive continuous spinal analgesia for their surgical procedures entered the study. After placement of non-invasive monitoring (ECG, BP and SpO2), an intrathecal catheter was placed in the lumbar area. In the supine position 15 patients in the study group received lidocaine 45 mg + epinephrine 15 mg and 14 patients in the control group received normal saline 3 ml intrathecally. After the injection, a blinded observer assessed the presence of the following signs at one minute intervals for five minutes: sensory loss by pin-prick (P) over the lumbar and sacral dermatomes, ability to raise legs (R), and subjective feeling of warmth (W) and heaviness (H) over the lower limbs. For each sign the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and negative (-) and positive (+) predictive value (PV) were calculated. At four minutes SN reached 100% (CI 78-100%) for R and H, while only R obtained a SP of 93% (CI 66-100%). Using R as detector of intrathecal injection the -PV was 100% and the +PV 25% (assuming a 2% prevalence of unintentional spinal). We conclude that, with our test dose; (a) four minutes are needed to recognize signs of intrathecal injection; (b) leg-raising is a reliable sign; and (c) inquiring about other signs may only decrease the diagnostic accuracy of this test.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Guay
The epidural test dose: a review.
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 921 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.